🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions about that remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player in the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown would have been understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the continued drought of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard went on to defeat a tired Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is more than within his right to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, 28, is placed number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s elite serve and concussive strength on each front side and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of most rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is frequently overmatched. The past few seasons has seen the curious rise of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless move around with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly exploded up to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of US male players lifting major titles when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task too little.

The American star achieved a career-best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with the American creating plenty of chances to break. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous service game to drop serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend far too much effort to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He extended the contest two times on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that the American is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than virtually anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only express how he feels or the tactic he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it forever if I fail to do it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely unlikely for all other players. {