🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where Black people are paid to address Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The period has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator gains confidence to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to erase the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.